King's Indian: Smyslov System
King's Indian Defense: Smyslov System
Definition
The Smyslov System is a variation of the King's Indian Defense that arises after the moves 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. Nf3 d6 5. Bg5 (ECO code E61). White immediately pins the f6-knight with Bg5, aiming to restrict Black’s typical …e5 break and to discourage the characteristic kingside pawn storm. The line is named after the 7th World Champion, Vasily Smyslov, who popularised it in the 1950s.
Typical Move-Order and Key Position
A frequently encountered sequence is:
By move 7 White has developed harmoniously, while Black must decide whether to challenge the pin with …h6 & …g5, unpin with …Nbd7, or transpose into other King’s Indian structures.
Strategic Ideas
-
For White
- Maintain the pin to delay …e5 or …c5, buying time for queenside expansion with c5, b4-b5, or central consolidation with e3.
- If Black plays …h6 …g5, retreating the bishop to g3 or h2 aims to provoke pawn weaknesses around the Black king.
- Flexibility: White can adopt Fianchetto ideas (g3, Bg2), switch to a Queen’s Indian–style set-up, or transpose to a Saemisch if f3 & e4 follow.
-
For Black
- Break the pin quickly with …h6 and/or …Nbd7, preparing the essential …e5 thrust.
- Accept the structural concession of …g5 for active piece play: the g-file may later assist a kingside attack.
- Alternatively, ignore the pin, castle, and use …c6–d5 or immediate …c5 to challenge the centre.
Historical Background
Vasily Smyslov unveiled the system at top level in the early 1950s, notably during the 1953 Zurich Candidates Tournament. His pragmatic, harmonious style contrasted with the highly tactical main lines of the King’s Indian, and many positional players embraced the variation. Later, grandmasters such as Gata Kamsky, Artur Yusupov, and Peter Svidler adopted the system as a reliable anti-King’s Indian weapon.
Illustrative Games
-
Smyslov – Bronstein, Zurich Candidates 1953
Smyslov calmly exploited the g-file weaknesses after 5…h6 6.Bh4 g5, later rerouting a knight to f5 to spearhead a decisive attack. -
Kamsky – Kasparov, Linares 1993
Kamsky used the Smyslov System to neutralise Kasparov’s dynamic ambitions, steering the game into an equal but safe endgame that he eventually drew. -
Svidler – Radjabov, Russian Superfinal 2004
A modern illustration of Black sacrificing queenside structure after …c5, yet achieving counterplay on the dark squares.
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
- Smyslov reportedly valued “health of the pieces” over material or structure; the pin with Bg5 epitomised his belief in harmonious coordination.
- In several correspondence games of the 1960s, players tested early h4 ideas for White (after 6.h4!?), foreshadowing modern computer-inspired pawn storms.
- The variation remains theoretically sound; engines often give White a small, stable plus of ≈ +0.30, making it popular in must-not-lose situations.
Why Choose the Smyslov System?
Players who prefer solid positional play with clear plans, while avoiding the razor-sharp Mar del Plata or Four-Pawns attack lines, will appreciate the Smyslov System. It offers:
- Reduced theoretical burden compared with heavily analysed KID main lines.
- Flexible transpositional potential to Queen’s Gambit or Catalan-type structures.
- A persistent strategic question for Black: “When and how to play …e5?”